In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Core i5-4460. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 80 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 5% less energy
Core i5-4460
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 216 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – May 11, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i5-4460: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-4460
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i5-4460 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i5-4460 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-4460
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4460 May 11th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $187.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1150 |
80W | Power Consumption | 84W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
