In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 22% faster in Rust – 254 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
