In Atomfall, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Core i3-10105
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-10105: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
