In Rust, the Xeon E5540 is slightly slower than the Xeon X5690. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5540
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 80 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Xeon X5690
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 212 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Feb 14, 2011 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5540 vs Xeon X5690: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5540 vs Xeon X5690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5540 vs Xeon X5690 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon X5690
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.733 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5690 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $774.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1366 |
80W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
