In Deathloop, the Xeon E5540 is slightly slower than the Pentium P6200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5540
No clear advantages
Pentium P6200
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Sep 26, 2010 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5540 vs Pentium P6200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5540 vs Pentium P6200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5540 vs Pentium P6200 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Pentium P6200
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Pentium P6200 Sep 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 26th, 2010 |
| $774.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
