In Elden Ring, the Xeon E5540 is slightly slower than the FX-8120. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5540
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
FX-8120
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring – 141 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Xeon E5540 vs FX-8120: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
141 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5540 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5540 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $774.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM3+ |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
