In Rust, the Xeon E5520 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 223 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5520 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5520 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5520 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
