In Atomfall, the Xeon E5520 is slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 80 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 5 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 13 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5520 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5520 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5520 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
45%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
