In Atomfall, the Xeon E5520 is slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5520 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5520 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5520 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
45%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
