In Rust, the Xeon E5520 is slightly slower than the Core i7-4765T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 216 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5520 vs Core i7-4765T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5520 vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5520 vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
