In Deathloop, the Xeon E5520 is slightly faster than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5520
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Core i3-9100F
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5520 vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5520 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5520 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
