In Rust, the Xeon E5520 is slightly slower than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Celeron G6900
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 228 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 46 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5520 vs Celeron G6900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5520 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5520 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $52.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 46W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
