In Rust, the Xeon E5-2699A v4 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $791 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2699A v4
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 31% faster in Rust – 278 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 73% cheaper – $288.00 vs $1078.93
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Rust – $1.03 vs $5.06/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 65 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
213 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
50%
Price, $
$1078.93
26%
Value, $/FPS
$5.06/FPS
20%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
91%
L3 Cache
30 MB
55%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $4,938.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 145 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
