In Rust, the Xeon E5-2699A v4 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $649 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2699A v4
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 283 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 60% cheaper – $429.99 vs $1078.93
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Rust – $1.51 vs $5.06/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 125 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
213 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
48%
Price, $
$1078.93
39%
Value, $/FPS
$5.06/FPS
30%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
283 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
92%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
65%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $4,938.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 145 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
