The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14600KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $1383.46 more expensive!
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 44 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-14600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 87% cheaper – $212.49 vs $1595.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 125 vs 145 Watts
Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i5-14600KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
188
80%
Min 1% FPS
129
81%
Price, $
$1595.95
13%
Value, $/FPS
$8.48/FPS
11%
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
236
100%
Min 1% FPS
160
100%
Price, $
$212.49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i5-14600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i5-14600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
64%
L3 Cache
24 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$4,938.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Broadwell-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
145 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
22 | Cores | 14 |
44 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
55 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |