In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2697 v3 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 145 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9950X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
14-core
88%
L3 Cache
35 MB
55%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
63%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Ryzen 9 9950X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2697 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| $2,702.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
145W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
