In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2690 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Xeon E5-2689
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 115 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 135W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
