In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2690 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $791 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 93% cheaper – $58.90 vs $850.00
- Up to 93% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in Atomfall – $0.31 vs $4.04/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 135 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
90%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
6%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
8%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
135W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
