In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2690 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $70 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 54% cheaper – $58.90 vs $128.99
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $0.31 vs $0.62/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 135 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
91%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
50%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
135W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
