In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2690 is slightly slower than the Core i3-9100F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $37 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 39% cheaper – $58.90 vs $96.00
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall – $0.31 vs $0.46/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
186 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
90%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
61%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 135W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
