In Rust, the Xeon E5-2690 is slower than the Core i3-14100F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $38 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 39% cheaper – $58.90 vs $96.99
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Rust – $0.28 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Rust
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 22% faster in Rust – 254 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 58 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
55%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
60%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
74%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
