In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2690 v3
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Up to 77% faster in Battlefield 6 – 124 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 77% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 105 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
94%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $2,090.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
