In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2690 v3
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 125 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 7% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $2,090.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 135W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
