In The Last of Us Part I, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Sep 08, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 251 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 35 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $2,090.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
