In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly faster than the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 115 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 12% less energy
Xeon W3530
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1366 |
115W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
