In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2690. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 115 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Xeon E5-2690
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Xeon E5-2690: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
98%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Xeon E5-2690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Xeon E5-2690 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA2011 |
115W | Power Consumption | 135W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
