In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2689 is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 115 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2023 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7980X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Oct 19th, 2023
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Oct 19th, 2023
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2745
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
22782
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7980X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
12%
L3 Cache
20 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Oct 19th, 2023
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X Oct 19th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $4,999.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | sTR5 |
115W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
