In Control, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 115 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1629.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1652
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
13962
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
25%
L3 Cache
20 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | TRX4 |
115W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
