In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly faster than the Pentium B960. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 months and 3 days newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Oct 02, 2011
- Is 5 months and 3 days newer
Pentium B960
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 35 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Pentium B960: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Pentium B960 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Pentium B960 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Pentium B960
Oct 2nd, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Pentium B960 Oct 2nd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
