In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly faster than the FX-8150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 months and 24 days newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 4 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 115 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
FX-8150
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs FX-8150: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
98%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
115W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
