In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly faster than the FX-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
FX-6300
- Is 7 months and 17 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 months and 17 days newer
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 95 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs FX-6300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
98%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $132.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
