In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2689 is same performance as the Core i7-6700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
No clear advantages
Core i7-6700
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jul 01, 2015 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 65 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$97.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
