In Rust, the Xeon E5-2689 is slightly faster than the Celeron 1007U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 210 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
Celeron 1007U
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 17 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 85% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2689 vs Celeron 1007U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Celeron 1007U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2689 vs Celeron 1007U in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
