In The Callisto Protocol, the Xeon E5-2687W v3 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2687W v3
No clear advantages
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 37% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 163 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 65 vs 160 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2687W v3 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
163 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
119 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2687W v3 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2687W v3 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2687W v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
25 MB
76%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
65%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2687W v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $2,141.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 160W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
