Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 135 vs 119 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |