In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2680 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $12 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $199.99 vs $211.95
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall – $0.96 vs $1.10/FPS
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
92%
Price, $
$211.95
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
87%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
