In Rust, the Xeon E5-2680 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $83 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 223 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 39% cheaper – $128.99 vs $211.95
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Rust – $0.57 vs $1.00/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
211 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
44 FPS
83%
Price, $
$211.95
60%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
57%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
