Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 39% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2680 - 213 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$744.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |