In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2680 is slightly faster than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2680
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 194 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
FX-8370
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
100%
Price, $
$211.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
