In GRID, the Xeon E5-2680 is same performance as the FX-4350. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $129 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2680
No clear advantages
FX-4350
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Up to 61% cheaper – $82.71 vs $211.95
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in GRID – $0.17 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in GRID
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
GRID FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$211.95
39%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
40%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
