In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2680 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $57 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2680
- Up to 21% cheaper – $211.95 vs $269.00
- Up to 21% cheaper
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 1% better value in Atomfall – $1.09 vs $1.10/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
79%
Price, $
$211.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
99%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
78%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
