In Rust, the Xeon E5-2680 is slightly slower than the Core i3-9100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $116 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2680
No clear advantages
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 224 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 55% cheaper – $96.00 vs $211.95
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Rust – $0.42 vs $1.00/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
211 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
80%
Price, $
$211.95
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
42%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
