In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2680 is slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $115 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2680
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 54% cheaper – $96.99 vs $212.44
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $1.09/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
84%
Price, $
$212.44
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
38%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
