In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2680 is same performance as the Core i3-10100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $112 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2680
No clear advantages
Core i3-10100
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 53% cheaper – $99.95 vs $211.95
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $0.96/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$211.95
47%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
47%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
