In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2678 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i5-2500. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2678 v3
No clear advantages
Core i5-2500
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i5-2500: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i5-2500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i5-2500 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500 Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
