In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-2678 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i3-380M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2678 v3
No clear advantages
Core i3-380M
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 207 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i3-380M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i3-380M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i3-380M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Released | Oct 26th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
