In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2678 v3 is slightly faster than the Celeron B820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Celeron B820: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Celeron B820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Celeron B820 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 120W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
