The Xeon E5-2676 v3 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2676 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-14900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 24 threads
Xeon E5-2676 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2676 v3
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
189
77%
Min 1% FPS
130
79%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
165
100%
Price, $
$453.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2676 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2676 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2676 v3
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
50%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2676 v3 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Haswell-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
120 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 12 | Cores | 24 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 6.0 GHz |
| 30 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
