In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2670 is slightly slower than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2670
No clear advantages
Celeron G6900
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 46 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 60% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2670 vs Celeron G6900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2670 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2670 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2670
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2670 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $52.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 46W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
