Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |